Sex column spurs debate

Many offended by piece, others support its publication

A sex column in Monday’s issue of the Foghorn News has led to much controversy on campus.

While some at Del Mar College found the column a light-hearted attempt at satire, others believe the package had no place in an educational setting.

The column, titled “Finals aren’t the only thing going down,” was accompanied by a series of illustrations depicting sex acts between both same-sex and heterosexual couples that some readers took offense to. Even college President Mark Escamilla addressed the issue.

“In the Del Mar College student newspaper, an editorial was published that contained material that may be offensive to readers. The material was published without the knowledge of the college administration, and it was solely the creation and action of the student newspaper staff. Del Mar College, while supporting the rights of a free press, also holds itself to an ethical standard that was not met by these students,” Escamilla stated in an email to all staff and faculty.

The Foghorn is independent from the college and, as with all college newspapers, is not subject to prior restraint by the administration.

Several professors used a group faculty and staff email string to express their disgust and question whether the author, Editor-in-Chief Mark Young, should be charged with distributing pornographic material to minors because Collegiate High School is housed at Del Mar.

“It is a shame that this student did not take into consideration the distribution of this pornography to underage students,” replied Melissa Stuive with the department of public safety education. “Providing access to children unter 18 is illegal.”

The Foghorn editors do not deliver the newspaper to the second floor of the St. Clair building, where Collegiate is located, but those students often take classes in other buildings that did receive the newspaper.

Tracie Rodriguez, principal of Collegiate High School, declined to comment when approached by a Foghorn reporter Wednesday.

Paul McCann from the English and philosophy department supported the publication of the material and called the idea of prosecuting Young an “outlandish response.”

“Surely you are aware that there are materials in our library that could easily be deemed far more pornographic than any cartoon published in the Foghorn. Not to mention that we have computers in the library that have access to the internet where the most vile pornographic images are a mere few keystrokes away,” McCann stated.

“Is it pornographic? Not by any legal definition of the term. It doesn’t violate community standards of decency in Corpus Christi by a shot!” McCann added.

History professor Dawson Barrett stated he does not believe dual credit students should be treated “as if they are children to be shielded.”

“Dual credit students are college students,” Barrett said via email. “We owe them the respect of allowing them to speak for themselves.”

Doug Harley, from the math department, said he was offended for religious reasons.

“This article is extremely offensive to my God and to my Catholic religion. I recommend that all copies of this edition be immediately destroyed,” Harley stated in an email.

Students on campus, most of whom had seen of the article, had differing opinions on whether it was appropriate for a college setting.

“Journalism and digital media, whether or not it’s too radical, is up to the public,” said Kodie Kapaun, a 19-year-old digital media major. “This column shows a great way to get to know your partner.”

Rosa Soto, 49-year-old liberal arts major, disapproved of the column. She said that while it is explicit, the idea of taking legal action against the author seemed drastic.

“Creo que hay otros maneras de hacer lo (I think there were other ways to do it),” she said.

3 thoughts on “Sex column spurs debate

  • Pingback:Editor stands behind column despite backlash : College Media Matters

  • May 3, 2018 at 7:39 pm
    Permalink

    Some interesting questions…. The Foghorn is funded by student fees, is it not? Obviously, there is a stipulation in the handbook about administration not being able to influence/punish, but what about stopping use of physical infrastructure (computers, paper, etc.) which are owned by the college? Back to the fees topic though…Refering to student fees that support the Foghorn….If even a cent of those fees are from some of the collegiate high school/dual credit students that are still of minor age, that means the Foghorn as enlisted and used the support of money from under-age students (Doesn’t matter if they are college students or not-They are still minors by law). Satire, or not, the column points toward encouraging sex as a means of helping students to prepare for finals. Which in case, the Foghorn is geared towards Del Mar students, and aren’t several minors (collegiate high school/dual credit) registered as students at Del Mar? That, in question, means the article is encouraging students of Del Mar (whether as a joke or not) to engage in sexual behavior, which by all means is legal for adults, but not legal to encourage among minors, and especially if any funds of those minors go to the Foghorn. Doesn’t matter if many parents pay the fees of their students attending. All it takes is one student with a job paying their own tuition and fees. I don’t know how fees are proportioned for the Foghorn, but definitely legality questions to ponder about the decision regarding this article.

    Reply
  • May 3, 2018 at 11:58 am
    Permalink

    I admire your courage for publishing the column.

    With actual pornography readily available with a few keystrokes (pun intended), your column reads like the parody it was meant to be.

    Among other noble purposes, such as exposing injustice or reporting the objective truth, journalism is meant to push the envelope on what some might consider indecent.

    If you’re still offended after viewing something “offensive,” note it, discuss it and move on with your life, secure in your convictions. But never, ever call for censorship or someone’s ouster simply because you’re offended. To do so would indicate you’ve missed the point of what journalism is meant to do.

    Mr. Young, if you stick to your journalistic principles, I believe you have a bright future ahead of you in this tumultuous industry.

    Reply
  • May 3, 2018 at 9:45 am
    Permalink

    This article was a horrible demonstration of irresponsible journalism. To come from the “editor in chief” makes it even worse. Quite honestly, it should call for his immediate dismissal from the position. The fact that anyone would say that it isn’t pornographic is absurd. The fact that any professor at Del Mar such as Mr. McCann or Mr. Barrett would support such an irresponsible article shows an apparent lack of value and respect for both males and females by the faculty and their character, as well as the content of their curriculum, should be called into question. The article is wrong on so many levels.

    Not only was I shocked by the pictorials but by the word choice of “gang bang” and the apparent lack of editorial skills used in the article. For someone whose biography states they are responsible for keeping the workplace professional, this is a very poor example. Furthermore, if I were a parent of ANY student, not just collegiate students, on campus, I would be on the front steps demanding the dismissal of Mr. Young.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *